Showing posts with label Consumer Reports Autos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Consumer Reports Autos. Show all posts

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Consumer Reports: Point/counterpoint: Fresh air in new sunroof trends

Interesting take on things....
Point: More and more automakers are installing large glass roof panels that can’t be opened. If I have a big sunroof letting light in, it makes me want fresh air, too. I’m a big moonroof fan, and initially liked the idea of these larger open roofs.

But after living with several, I’ve found they’re usually too noisy to open on the highway and only really useful on back roads. Plus, if you don’t use the sunshade, they add a lot of heat in the cabin on sunny days, making the air conditioner work harder. Some of these panels-like on the Lincoln MKT and the Volkswagen Passat CC--don’t even open at all. I’d prefer automakers go back to offering smaller, normal, quiet moonroofs.
Eric Evarts

Counterpoint: I don’t like moonroofs. Sure, they can be an occasional novelty, but I much prefer a lower purchase price, more head room, and reduced risk of problems. Plus, I like a quiet cabin where I can enjoy music or the company of my traveling companions.

For me, the trend of fixed glass tops is welcomed. Exposing more of the outside world can be wonderful on a tree-lined road or even just during balmy weather with fluffy clouds in the sky by day and stars at night. In most vehicles so-equipped, fixed glass benefits the rear passengers, creating a more open cabin feel and enhancing their enjoyment.
Jeff Bartlett

Source;
http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2010/06/pointcounterpoint-fresh-air-in-new-sunroof-trends.html

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Survey: Honda perceived to be tops in customer, quality commitment

Among seven major auto brands, consumers consider Honda to be the most committed to customers and to product quality. Ford ranked second, followed by Nissan, Chevrolet, and Toyota, based on a new survey by the Consumer Reports National Research Center. Hyundai and Chrysler trailed the others by a significant margin.
To see how consumers' perception of a brand's commitment to customers and quality has changed in the wake of Toyota's high-profile safety and image challenges, the Consumer Reports National Research Center conducted a telephone survey using a nationally representative sample. More than 1,700 interviews were completed among adults whose household owns at least one vehicle.
Honda truly stands out by this measure, being perceived as having much greater customer and quality commitment than its chief rivals. Key to this accomplishment is that Honda has a reputation for building good vehicles that perform well, are fuel efficient, and have strong reliability histories.
Ford continues its march, with strong showings in several recent Consumer Reports surveys, good overall reliability, and, unlike its domestic peers, continued goodwill among consumers for having taken no federal assistance.
Toyota had a relatively decent showing here, though trailing its chief competitors.
Although Hyundai's newer models have generally performed well in our tests, the brand's challenge still seems to be communicating this to consumers. Less than 50 percent of respondents felt that Hyundai was committed to its customers or quality.
The recent financial troubles, dealer closings, and lack of new product may have been factors in the last-place finish for Chrysler. Currently, to the average consumer, Chrysler has not been showing much commitment of any kind.
The bottom line
As we have written before, perception can differ from reality. When shopping for your next new or used car, do your homework by checking ratings and road tests. You may find that the brands you are considering have changed more rapidly than your perceptions.
Source;

Saturday, April 17, 2010

What's really behind the Toyota debacle

Interesting read, a lot of things that I didn't know....
(Fortune) -- At 77, Hiroshi Okuda, chairman of Toyota, is still causing trouble for the automaker.

He is being painted, most recently in Wednesday's Wall Street Journal, as both the architect of a global expansion that proved ruinous and an enemy of the Toyoda family.

But blaming Okuda for what has gone wrong at Toyota (TM) recently hardly gets to the root cause of the company's problems.

For that, Toyota executives will have to look deeper into themselves. If they are diligent, they will find an anachronistic management structure that has proved inefficient and counterproductive, and could be potentially ruinous.

Toyota is basically organized the same way it was half-a-century ago when it first began selling cars in the U.S. None of its operations are functionally integrated -- and all report back to Japan.

It is a caricature of a chimneyed company with vertical structures and no coordination.
While it may have suited the much smaller company of a generation ago, it no longer does. Toyota has expanded its presence in the U.S. significantly.

Indeed, if Toyota's North American operations were pushed together, the company would resemble one of the Detroit Three, with engineering, manufacturing, purchasing, and sales all housed under one roof. If any of those functions detected, say, a quality problem with an accelerator pedal, it could quickly relay the news and work with the others until a solution was found.

That kind of functional integration is one of the big reasons for the current success at Ford (F, Fortune 500). CEO Alan Mulally holds a meeting on Thursdays at which all of his top managers attend and at which they share information.

At Toyota, by comparison, engineering, manufacturing, purchasing, and sales report back to headquarters in Japan. Only there is the information disseminated among regions and functions.

It is an organizational scheme more befitting of a tiny manufacturer from a developing country than a global behemoth with aspirations to dominate the industry.

So when Jim Lentz, the American head of Toyota Motor Sales, testified that he had no power to order the recall of a vehicle, he was merely stating a longstanding fact of life at Toyota. He had neither the necessary information nor the authority to do so.

Executives at other automakers were stunned. As one competitor said, "Jim Lentz saying the American management team had no say in recalls was the thing that surprised me most. There was not a lot of cross divisional communication."

Toyota's archaic management structure has been an issue with its American executives for at least two decades.

According to one insider, action has been delayed in part because of a power struggle that pits the powerful U.S. sales arm against other divisions of the company.

Most recently that friction has been reflected by a dispute over the role of Toyota Motor North America, the New York-based holding company for North American operations.

In an effort to speed integration, a respected executive, Jim Press was moved from his job as head of Toyota Motor Sales to head of Toyota Motor North America.

In September 2006, Press made a presentation to Toyota's corporate board asking that his North American organization be kept informed of quality efforts by strengthening communication with Toyota Motor Sales, Toyota Engineering and Manufacturing, and company headquarters in Japan.

Presciently, Press was worried about safety. He detected a steady rise in Toyota's safety recalls, which, he warned, were denting customer loyalty.

To improve the company's relationship with NHTSA, the government's car safety agency, Press argued for better communication between North America and the company's technical side: "We need faster information flow, and more technical support when hot issues arrive."

Press's plea fell on deaf ears and Press became frustrated. Feeling he had been made into a "window worker," a Japanese term for an older employee with no responsibilities, Press left Toyota to join Chrysler a year later.

Belatedly, Toyota has shifted more power to Toyota Motor North America by appointing a popular executive, Yoshimi Inaba, to oversee both it and Toyota Motor Sales.

Inaba is said to have the ear of Toyota President Akio Toyoda. So far, however, any reforms he has put in place have been overwhelmed by the sudden acceleration recall crisis.

Toyota seems to have learned one lesson from all this: it now moves faster when controversies arise. It halted sales of the Lexus GX 460 within hours after Consumer Reports labeled it a safety risk.

Now it needs to move just as fast to fix its dysfunctional management structure.

Source;
http://money.cnn.com/2010/04/14/autos/toyota_management.fortune/