Showing posts with label GM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GM. Show all posts

Friday, May 27, 2011

India: Ford, GM and Honda Sales Drops In April 2011

ford-fiesta-india
India: Ford, GM and Honda Sales Drops In April 2011 - Interest rates rose and prices of cars has a negative impact on the balance sheet of the manufacturer. The Indian subsidiary of General Motors, Ford and Honda Motor posted sales drops in the month of April 2011. Auto experts estimate that this would signal a difficult year for the entire automotive industry.

GM_india
General Motors India registered a 5.19 percent drop in sales in April 2011, to 10,050 over the same month last year. In April 2011, the company sold 3889 units of small car Spark, 2447 Beat hatchback units, 157 units of premium hatch UVA, 162 units of Aveo entry-level sedan, 376 units of mid-size sedan Optra and 939 units Cruze sedan.

Honda_India
Honda Siel Cars India reported 43.76 per cent decline in sales is 2012 units in April compared with 3,578 units sold during the same month a year ago. Sales in April of 1542 consisted of units of its flagship sedan of the city, 112 units of the Jazz hatchback, 253 units of premium sedan Civic, 83 units of luxury sedan Accord and 22 units of its SUV CR-V, the company said in a statement.

U.S. automaker Ford's Indian subsidiary Ford India has reported a slight decline of 2.5 percent of sales in April to 7319 units. The company recorded sales of 7,509 units in the same month last year. But the company was encouraged to see their new world festival to receive a response after it opened recently.

Related Posts:

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Thursday, April 22, 2010

GM pays back government loans in full

Here's a bit of good news....
Kansas City, Kansas – General Motors has made its final payment of US$5.8 billion to the U.S. Treasury and Export Development Canada, paying back its government loans in full and ahead of schedule. The payment includes $4.7 billion to the U.S. Treasury, and $1.1 billion to Export Development Canada.

The announcement was made by GM chairman and CEO Ed Whitacre at a ceremony in Fairfax, Kansas to announce an investment of $257 million in Fairfax and Detroit Hamtramck assembly centres. The investment will prepare Fairfax to build the next-generation Chevrolet Malibu and make Detroit Hamtramck a second source for the model. Fairfax currently builds the current Malibu and the Buick LaCrosse.

As part of the launch of the new GM, the U.S., Canadian and Ontario governments provided loans of $8.4 billion and took equity stakes in the new company. The latest payment completes the payback of the loans.

“GM’s ability to pay back the loans ahead of schedule is a sign that our plan is working, and that we are on the right track,” Whitacre said. “It is also an important first step toward allowing our stockholders to reduce their equity investments in GM. We still have much hard work ahead of us, but we are making progress toward our vision of designing, building and selling the world’s best vehicles. We appreciate the support the taxpayers have given GM, and our new great products are tangible results of that support.”

Source;
http://www.canadiandriver.com/2010/04/21/gm-pays-back-government-loans-in-full.htm

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

How Long can Honda 'Go it Alone'?

Here are a couple of good articles....
Daimler-Renault-Nissan deal puts spotlight on scale
(Reuters) - The link-up between Renault-Nissan and Daimler (DAIGn.DE) shows the urgent need for scale in an industry still reeling from a collapse in demand and gearing up for massive investment in green-car technology.

Under intense pressure to shave costs, automakers just outside the top global sales ranks are certain to face calls to develop or expand alliances or to explain to their shareholders why they are betting off going it alone.

That will mean renewed scrutiny of growth strategies by the likes of Japan's Mitsubishi Motors (7211.T), France's PSA Peugeot Citroen (PEUP.PA), Germany's BMW (BMWG.DE) and even Italy's Fiat (FIA.MI), analysts say.

"We are going to see some significant mergers, acquisitions, restructurings and spinoffs," said David Cole, director of the Center of Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Just three years ago, Daimler moved to unwind one of the least successful deals in the history of the auto industry, dumping its Chrysler unit for a $30 billion loss.

Now, the Mercedes-maker has decided a more limited deal with the Renault-Nissan (RENA.PA) (7201.T) alliance headed by Carlos Ghosn will give it the small-car technology and scope it needs in the face of tighter emissions and fuel economy standards.

In return, Renault-Nissan will get access to Daimler's engines for Nissan's luxury Infiniti brand and the opportunity to share vehicle platforms and bring down costs at a time when its own alliance has been seen as sputtering.

Cole said the deal could be a blueprint for future collaboration in a high-cost area: developing the engine, transmission and now battery-drive systems that power vehicles.

"The historic view is that the powertrain defines the personality of the vehicle in the eyes of consumers. That's probably not true anymore," he said.

FIAT TO FOLLOW?
For smaller players such as Japan's Suzuki Motor Corp (7269.T), developing technologies such as a complex hybrid system on its own was not an option, which is why it aligned itself with Volkswagen AG (VOWG_p.DE) late last year.

Similarly, last month, Mazda Motor (7261.T) struck a deal to buy hybrid technology from market-leader Toyota Motor (7203.T).

Elsewhere, Italy's Fiat last year teamed up with bankrupt Chrysler, and analysts said it could look for further partners in Asia after having formed joint ventures with Tata Motors Ltd (TAMO.BO) in India and others in China and Russia.

"I could easily see Fiat shopping for another alliance in Asia," said Logan Robinson, a professor at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law and former auto executive.

China is likely to be a key. Its emergence as the world's largest car market has been a boon to sales for U.S., European and Japanese car makers, but it has also created competitors such as Geely (0175.HK) -- fresh off its acquisition of Sweden's Volvo -- with deep pockets and global ambitions.

Still, after the numerous false starts over the past two decades -- most notably with the spectacular break-up of DaimlerChrysler after nine years -- some analysts remain skeptical that alliances can deliver as promised.

"I'm hoping that others don't go down this path" taken by Renault-Nissan and Daimler, said Erich Merkle, analyst at Autoconomy.com. "If you look at the history of alliances...they have a very checkered past. Most of them haven't worked.

While financial markets tend to price progress in quarters, it can take four years or longer to capture the full cost savings from collaboration in developing a new vehicle even if everything goes as planned, analysts say.

TOUGH EXECUTION
Even Nissan and Renault, lauded as a rare example of an alliance that has worked, has had a mediocre start.

After a decade together, the partners admitted last year to needing deeper integration, putting in place a more formal structure to squeeze out synergies that engineers had resisted. The partnership saved near-bankrupt Nissan from demise, but Renault has fallen into a slump Ghosn has struggled to reverse.

That could be a lesson for Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne, who faces the daunting task of integrating Chrysler after taking a 20 percent stake in the weakest U.S. carmaker out of a U.S.-government funded bankruptcy.

Marchionne has said that automakers need global sales of at least 6 million cars and trucks to be competitive on cost. The Daimler-Renault-Nissan alliance would just clear that hurdle with global sales of just over 6 million units.

Fiat-Chrysler remains short of the mark, closer to 4.5 million units. But size alone is no guarantee of success.

General Motors Co GM.UL is a case in point. After its own 2009 bankruptcy, GM, like crosstown rival Ford Motor Co (F.N), is struggling bring the focus back to its core brands, led by Chevy.
Even Toyota, the world's top automaker, has proven that the bigger the ship, the tougher it is to steer. Rather than seek tie-ups, Toyota has said it would slim down its vehicle line-up to become more nimble and efficient.

FLYING SOLO
Having failed to agree terms on a capital alliance with Frances PSA, Japan's Mitsubishi Motors is seen by analysts in need of a partner to offset the cost of developing advanced technologies in areas like battery-powered cars.

But Mitsubishi President Osamu Masuko told Reuters last month that equity-based tie-ups were no guarantee of success.

"We have to remember that a capital alliance is no panacea," Masuko said. "If it were, then why didn't it work for us with Chrysler? Or with Daimler? What happened with all the capital ties that General Motors had?"

Honda Motor Co (7267.T) also believes it can find new efficiencies in-house will as Japan's second-biggest automaker continues to shun alliances, much like BMW.

"The key now is figuring out how to efficiently develop and produce cars," Honda executive Fumihiko Ike said last month. "And if the company becomes too big, efficiencies will also fail."
Honda, which prides itself in being the world's top engine maker and one of the few carmakers to produce its own transmissions, says it is open to tying up with battery and other components makers to develop next-generation vehicles.

BMW, meanwhile, has project-based ties, including with PSA in small engines, and expects its cooperation on sourcing with Daimler will continue, notwithstanding the latter's deal with Renault and Nissan.

"We don't want to give up our independence," BMW Chief Financial Officer Friedrich Eichiner said. "I don't see a big problem if a manufacturer like Daimler is now cooperating with Nissan. They must have reasons to do that."

(Additional reporting by Soyoung Kim in DETROIT; Irene Preisinger in MUNICH; Jo Winterbottom in MILAN; John Bowker in MOSCOW; Helen Massy-Beresford in PARIS; William Rigby in SEATTLE; Editing by Lincoln Feast)
Source;
Car industry braces for further shakeup
Pressure to cut development costs intense Kana Inagaki
By KANA INAGAKI
Kyodo News

YOKOHAMA — With Nissan Motor Co. and its French partner Renault SA looking to expand their clout through a new cross-sharing deal with Germany's Daimler AG, the big question is: who is next in the realignment of the global auto industry?
In Japan, experts say eyes are on Honda Motor Co., the nation's second-largest automaker, although it has so far shown no indication of ditching its trademark go-it-alone policy.

Pressure has been heavy on carmakers to pursue expansion of scale to save on development costs of highly expensive green technology and to secure their foothold in fast-growing emerging markets by offering affordable compacts.

In the latest agreement, the Nissan-Renault alliance and Daimler will mutually swap 3.1 percent in shares to cooperate in the development of next-generation compact cars and to share fuel-efficient engine technology.

Just a few months earlier, Suzuki Motor Corp. inked a capital tieup with Volkswagen AG, as the German automaker seeks to expand its presence in India, where Suzuki has established a solid presence, while the Japanese automaker turns to Volkswagen's expertise in developing environmentally friendly vehicles.

"It costs a lot to develop wide-ranging technologies, and there is no clear favorite among the scattered environmental technologies, including electric vehicles and hybrids," said Takashi Akiyama, vice president of SC-ABeam Automotive Consulting.

"Also, with the rapid expansion of emerging markets, it's hard for an automaker to make it on its own," he said. "Expansion of scale is necessary for survival, and further realignment in the industry is anticipated."

With dwindling choices for cross-border alliances, attention has naturally fallen on Honda, one of the strongest players in the industry. The automaker has continued to eke out profits, even as most auto giants sank into the red after the financial crisis hit in 2008.

"You need great energy to reach an understanding with an alliance partner and time is quickly lost during that process," Fumihiko Ike, Honda's head of Asia and Oceania operations, recently told reporters. "It's faster to do it alone."

But analysts said even Honda, which sells the Fit compact and the Insight hybrid, may eventually need to shift course and look outside as rivals pose a rising threat by becoming bigger and more cost-efficient.

"There is no need to immediately join forces since its products, centering on compact cars, are selling well," said Shigeru Matsumura, an auto analyst at SMBC Friend Research Center. "But Honda will probably not be able to stay the way it is as others form alliances and boost their cost competitiveness."

Tatsuya Mizuno, a former auto analyst at Fitch Ratings in Tokyo and current representative of consulting firm Mizuno Credit Advisory, also suggested Honda may ally with South Korea's Hyundai Motor Co. in a shakeup that he predicted will consolidate the industry into five major automotive groups.

The dramatic shift in the global auto sector also comes as an unprecedented safety crisis pounds the carefully cultivated reputation of Toyota Motor Corp., the world's largest carmaker.

With global sales of nearly 8 million vehicles, Toyota remains ahead in terms of both scale and product lineup with minicar maker Daihatsu Motor Co. and truck maker Hino Motors Ltd. under its wing.

A pioneer in gas-electric hybrid technology, it also has close ties with Mazda Motor Corp. and Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd., which makes the Subaru brand and is owned 16.5 percent by Toyota.
Yet, the current story of Toyota includes a series of safety lapses, which its president, Akio Toyoda, has blamed on an aggressive drive for volume at the expense of product quality.
"The advantages of scale are huge and will need to be pursued as they become increasingly important," Mizuno said. "But as the scale becomes bigger, the question is whether you can maintain strong management."

Despite the hype over the emergence of new alliances, deals have frequently collapsed in the past, including the breakup of Daimler and Chrysler Group LLC.

"When we came together with Chrysler, we were in agreement about the merger, but we hadn't had much thought about content of collaboration," Daimler Chairman Dieter Zetsche said at a news conference in Brussels, emphasizing that the relationship with Renault and Nissan will be "totally different."

Nissan President Carlos Ghosn, who concurrently serves as chief executive officer of Renault, said the "strategic cooperation" with Daimler — not to be mistaken with an alliance — will be long-term, while the pursuit of scale will continue as Nissan and Renault vie to become the No. 1 automotive group.
Source;

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Toyota Pulls a 'General Motors'...Again

This is something that I am not happy seeing, Toyota is going down a slippery road taking this route....
As the February 2010 have rolled out, a number of sources noted that Toyota is responding to its plummet in the figures with incentives and 0% financing. While this seems like a sure-fire way to boost their sales in the short term, it also makes Toyota sound more and more like the General Motors of the 1970s and 80s.

Consider this: Over the past decade Toyota has gone against longstanding traditional mores governing parent company/parts supplier relationships by putting the screws to their suppliers even in the best of times in order to milk the most profit out of each part. In addition to abusing their suppliers, Toyota has put international growth above all else (even by their own admission). After the first indications that this growth strategy could be taking its toll on vehicle reliability (sludging problems and other issues in the early 2000s) they respond not by becoming more proactive about beefing up reliability, but by spending tens of millions on lobbying to either kill or postpone new safety regulations and limit the scope of their mandatory recalls. When their efforts to skirt around costly recalls finally begin to catch up to them, they issue a massive recall that still manages to not cover all of the cars the NHTSA has recieved complaints about (i.e., the pre-2007 Camry). This recall is quickly "resolved" with a fix that not everyone is entirely certain will even solve the main problem in the first place. In response to the sales numbers lagging from the recall, Toyota creates incentives the likes of which they have never before imagined, which will certainly lead to a further devaluation of the other Toyotas on the road and the erosion of one of their biggest selling-points (resale value).

It doesn't take a historian to see the General Motors-esque pattern developing here. ("Profit Above All Else -> Short Term Thinking -> Negative Results from Short Term Thinking (unreliability) -> More Short Term Thinking (lobbying to avoid repair costs rather than simply recalling the product and fixing future models) -> More Negative Results (increasing numbers of complaints and/or deaths) -> More Short Term Thinking (hastily executed recall that may not have even solved the problem entirely) -> Product Devaluation -> More Short Thinking (incentives) -> Further Product Devaluation) Heck, GM got it down to a science in the 1970s and 80s, right before they were forced to pay the price. One has to wonder how long Toyota will play the old school General Motors game, and what kind of impact this will have on them in the long term. As anyone familiar with the history of the domestic auto manufacturers knows, you can only mortgage against public goodwill and favorable opinions about your company for so long before your company's reputation is upside down and your credit is damaged irrevocably.

Source;
http://www.toyotamonitor.com/blog/1043077_toyota-pulls-a-general-motors-again

Thursday, February 25, 2010

GM will wind down Hummer as the sale could not be completed

I guess the good news is that gas prices should go down with Hummer out of the game, it's that whole supply and demand thing.... alright, it's not that funny....
As expected, GM announced today that the deal to sell Hummer to Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machines Co., Ltd. (Tengzhong) was unable to be completed and as a result the American branf will be wound down.

After Pontiac and Saturn, another one bites the dust! But don’t worry… GM will still continue to honor Hummer warranties and provide service support and spare parts to Hummer owners.

“One year ago, General Motors announced that we were going to divest HUMMER, as part of focusing our efforts on Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac going forward. We have since considered a number of possibilities for HUMMER along the way, and we are disappointed that the deal with Tengzhong could not be completed,” said John Smith GM vice president of corporate planning and alliances. “GM will now work closely with HUMMER employees, dealers and suppliers to wind down the business in an orderly and responsible manner.”

Source;
http://www.4wheelsnews.com/gm-will-wind-down-hummer-as-the-sale-could-not-be-completed/

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Toyota learns the dangers of being No. 1

At the end of the day you can say one thing about this whole Toyota debacle, they are doing the right thing.

Quality problems follow period of rapid expansion
When Toyota Motor Corp. (TM-N79.77----%) was on the brink of overtaking General Motors as the world's biggest auto maker in 2008, executives were busy sending out warning signals about the dangers of being No. 1.

Toyota is now witnessing the realization of those fears, caught in a mushrooming recall debacle affecting as many as eight million cars – a development many say underscores the difficulty of maintaining top-notch quality in a hasty expansion.

It may also be the manifestation of the “big-company disease” that Toyota President Akio Toyoda has vowed to quash since taking the helm last June, aiming to restore the company's solid foundation that he said was lost during a decade of rapid global growth.

Mr. Toyoda has not commented publicly on the faulty accelerators and floor mats since expressing regret for the deaths of four people in a crash linked to the problems in August last year.

“Toyota is the new GM in terms of experiencing quality glitches, overexpansion and the proliferation of new product models,” said Dennis Virag, president of Automotive Consulting Group.

“Toyota has been too aggressive and perhaps complacent in terms of focus on quality. They can't concentrate on the details with so many models.”

Toyota, Japan's largest company with a market capitalization of around $141-billion, produces dozens of models around the world and has more than 500 subsidiary companies.

Toyoda, who warned last year that his company faced the prospect of “capitulation to irrelevance or death“, citing a five-phase road to demise outlined by business scholar Jim Collins, has his work cut out for him.

The reason? Toyota's recent quality woes are not new.

As vehicle recalls mounted to more than a million a year, then-president Katsuaki Watanabe in 2006 assigned two executive vice-presidents to oversee quality improvements. One was tasked specifically to work closely with suppliers to catch design defects early.

The current recalls in North America and Europe involve accelerator pedals produced by CTS Corp.

Two years later, in 2008, Mr. Watanabe had said those efforts had borne fruit, and that recall cases had fallen dramatically. Indeed, the “back-to-basics” goal was one that Mr. Watanabe had promptly pledged when he took office as far back as 2003.

The latest recall, of unprecedented scale, throws the efforts back to square one.

Mr. Toyoda, the grandson of Toyota's founder, has outlined broad steps aimed at returning the company to profit and speed up decision making, but has yet to announce new plans to improve quality checks.

TOYOTA-BASHING

The level of attention on Toyota's woes – from consumer groups, media and the government – is also the manifestation of another major fear that Toyota has harboured: that public opinion could be unkind to those at the top.

In addition to the recall, Toyota has shut down sales of its best-selling vehicles in North America under pressure from the Obama administration to address the product safety issue, in an almost unheard-of intervention.

Unlike GM, Toyota has feared the backlash and shunned the spotlight as the world's biggest auto maker. As the Detroit giant – once the symbol of U.S. industrial might – faced bankruptcy last year, those worries had escalated.

Many industry watchers say matter-of-factly that Toyota's massive loss forecasts for this year were a deliberate attempt to prevent a potential bashing – a charge that Toyota denies.

Last May, Toyota projected an operating loss of a staggering ¥850-billion ($9.4-billion) for the financial year to March 31. It has since revised that to a ¥350-billion loss, but analysts expect it to end up at close to break-even.

“If I were the president, I would do the same thing,” said Toshiro Yoshinaga, an analyst at Aizawa Securities.

“As long as GM is sick, it wouldn't look good if Toyota turned a profit this year,” he said.
Many also see Toyota's handling of the current recall as an attempt to win over consumers' hearts.

Toyota said on Wednesday it would offer to replace floor mats or accelerator pedals on another 1.1 million vehicles across five models in the United States because many consumers had called asking for a remedy. A Toyota spokesman said there was in fact no known glitch in those models, and that the voluntary action was solely meant to appease worried drivers.

“Toyota is trying very hard to do the right thing and being bold and having large recalls to portray the fact that they are willing to stop at nothing and spare no expense so nobody gets hurt in their vehicles,” said Jake Fisher, automotive engineer at Consumer Reports.

Meanwhile, “challenger” GM has capitalized on Toyota's woes, saying it would offer incentives to U.S. consumers switching from Toyota cars.

But Mitsuru Kurokawa, an analyst at IHS Global Insight, said would-be Toyota buyers would not necessarily flock to U.S. brands, but rather to rivals such as Hyundai Motor.

“And if that happens, there's a chance that the criticism will then turn to Hyundai,” he said.

Source;
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/toyota-learns-the-dangers-of-being-no-1/article1447164/

Thursday, January 7, 2010

New car sales were strong in December; see last month's and last year's 20 top sellers

December's new car sales were the highest of any month in 2009, with many key models picking up significant volume and most automakers posting a sales gain over December 2008, but it wasn't enough to rescue the entire year.

The Ford F-Series full-size pickup and Toyota Camry midsize sedan were yet again the nation's favorite vehicle and car, respectively, both December and throughout 2009.
Ford also saw strong success from its redesigned Fusion midsize sedan, which jumped from 17th place in 2008 to a slot on the top-10 best-selling list of 2009, and its Focus compact and Escape midsize weren't far behind. The Escape was also the best-selling SUV in December, unseating the Honda CR-V that itself had stolen the crown from Ford's Explorer several years ago.

General Motors, meanwhile, had an excellent month for its Chevrolet Malibu midsize, which beat out the Fusion and Nissan's Altima in December to be the country's third-best-selling midsize sedan, behind the Camry and Honda Accord. The Chevrolet Equinox compact/midsize SUV also did well at over 12,000 units -- a record for the model -- and the compact Chevrolet Cobalt's sales improved from abysmal to just mediocre. GM did, however, see its best-seller -- the Chevrolet Silverado pickup -- slide below both the Toyota Camry and Corolla last month even as its own sales jumped significantly month-to-month. (see sales charts below the article)

In other Ford/GM news, the automakers' ongoing rivalry between the Mustang and Camaro retro muscle cars saw the Ford inch closer to the sales of its rival, narrowing a once-mighty gap to just over 1,000. This Mustang sales increase comes even as Camaro sales stay strong at 7,500 last month and in the same month that Ford announced it would give massive upgrades to next year's Mustang.

The top-ten list seems mostly familiar for the total of 2009, but some major changes in December suggest 2010 might be an interesting year for auto sales. See the two sales charts below:
Source (via autoblog);
http://www.examiner.com/x-1017-DC-Car-Examiner~y2010m1d5-New-car-sales-were-strong-in-December-see-last-months-and-last-years-20-top-sellers

Friday, December 11, 2009

First-Gen Honda Civic Stalks GM's DC Office, Taunts Staff By Running For 30-Plus Years

Quick announcement: Will the owner of the rust-on-white first-gen Honda Civic parked outside GM's Washington DC office please stop stalking the office staff and remove your vehicle from out front. You're sort of freaking them out.

Thanks ever so kindly to the GM Washington, DC staff for sending in these two pictures of the rusted Civic they called the "Mother of all clunkers" parked out front of their office yesterday.


Source;
http://jalopnik.com/5424215/first+gen-honda-civic-stalks-gms-dc-office-taunts-staff-by-running-for-30+plus-years

Monday, December 7, 2009

BusinessWeek: The Battle Raging Inside GM

Henderson's ouster leaves Whitacre and the board of mostly Detroit outsiders calling the shots. And that's making GM's executives jittery

By David Welch
The Dec.1 ouster of Frederick A. "Fritz" Henderson as General Motors' CEO was a surprise, but only in how fast it happened. Since GM emerged from bankruptcy in September, Chairman Edward Whitacre Jr. had become the de facto chief executive, and his board had reversed one of Henderson's biggest decisions. Now, as Whitacre looks for a new CEO (assuming he doesn't take the job himself), he and the directors are in the driver's seat. Whitacre and much of the board are industry outsiders. Now GM veterans are asking: Do they know what they're doing?

Dumping Henderson made tactical sense. He was a GM lifer and restructuring expert running a company that now needs a strategic visionary with expertise in reaching consumers. But firing and replacing him with Whitacre, at least on an interim basis, is risky. He will have to make big calls: how to fix the European business, burnish GM's brands, choose new vehicles, and build a management team. None of it will be easy for a former telecom guy who told employees on Dec.2 that he doesn't even know where his office is. "Now Whitacre is on the hot seat," says James N. Hall, principal of 2953 Analytics, a Detroit-area consulting firm. "He has to listen, trust the leadership team, and filter out GM's autoimmune system." (GM declined to comment.)

Nervous Executives
One of Whitacre's big challenges will be motivating a jittery staff. Right after Henderson's firing, Whitacre held a conference call with GM's top executives. Some asked if he wanted their resignations, too. Whitacre tried to assuage their concerns. "He was clear that we have good people," says an executive who was on the call. "He said: 'I can't do this without you.' "

But Whitacre's soothing words are cold comfort. He told Bloomberg News in mid-November that Henderson had the board's confidence. Two weeks later Henderson was gone. Several GM executives say the uncertainty is hurting morale. "It's almost like experience is a liability these days," one says.

Already, some top executives are getting antsy. Sources close to Vice-Chairman Robert A. Lutz say he is dismayed at Henderson's firing. The 77-year-old executive doesn't like how it was handled and has told people close to him he is not even sure what his role will be. If Lutz were to leave, GM would lose the one guy who has managed to bypass GM's sclerotic culture and build cars people will actually pay decent money for. "Is this the time to blow the whole thing up again?" wonders Joseph Phillippi, a veteran GM watcher and principal of Auto Trends, a New Jersey consulting firm.

While Whitacre looks for Henderson's replacement, GM's new hyper-independent board will be calling the shots. It's far from clear that the directors have made the right decisions so far. Particularly worrisome to GM veterans are the actions of private equity executives Steve Girsky, David Bonderman, and Daniel Akerson. All three were tough on Henderson in board meetings, say executives briefed on the discussions. They pushed Henderson to keep GM's German unit Opel rather than sell it. GM has long needed an independent board, but GM insiders fear that too much second-guessing could prevent the company from sticking to a clear strategy. (The three directors couldn't be reached for comment.)

The Opel Reversal
The decision to keep Opel was divisive. The board thought it too risky to cede control of GM's European engineering works, where the company designs its small and midsize cars. Plus, GM would lose up to 1.5million cars a year in sales. But holding on to the subsidiary is risky, too. Opel hasn't made money in a decade and is in the throes of restructuring. Finishing the job will cost GM some $3billion and divert executive focus from the troubled North American business and expanding operations in Asia and Latin America.

As Whitacre steers GM in the interim, he may learn a few lessons. He wants GM to push market share above 20% next year from 19.7% today. But as GM phases out Hummer, Pontiac, Saab, and Saturn, the carmaker will lose more buyers. What's more, Whitacre wants GM to expand market share with lower discounts. That's a prudent goal, but people don't rush to buy damaged brands for no reason. While GM's November sales fell just 1.5%, the company outspent its rivals on incentives by at least $1,000 a car, blowing $4,300 per vehicle, says Edmunds.com. If Whitacre pulls back too much on the discounts, sales could plummet.

As for Henderson's replacement, Whitacre and the board want a non-GM person or an industry outsider such as Alan Mulally, who left Boeing (BA) and has since managed to bring Ford Motor (F) back from the brink. But potential candidates will have to consider two facts of life: an activist chairman and board and a salary that GM's government minders have capped at $1million. "It's a sick company with a bad ownership structure and pay constraints," says Charles Elson, director of the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. "I don't know who they will get." The only person willing to report to Ed Whitacre may wind up being—that's right—Ed Whitacre.

Welch is BusinessWeek's Detroit bureau chief.

Source;
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_50/b4159000314215.htm?chan=autos_autos+--+lifestyle+subindex+page_top+stories

Friday, June 5, 2009

Jay Leno's turbine-powered EcoJet supercar !.. [1024X768][280X960]..

The EcoJet is powered by a Honeywell LT-101 turbine engine producing 650 horsepower and 400 ft-lbs that runs on bio-diesel fuel. The engine sits in a modified Corvette Z06 hydroformed aluminum frame with aluminum and magnesium structural and chassis components.
The vehicle's shell is an advanced construction of carbon fiber over Kevlar.
The EcoJet's shape is a mix of Cadillac's current design language and cues taken from F1 racers and aeronautical craft.
ECOJET SPECIFICATIONS:
Vehicle description: mid-engine, turbine-powered, two-seat supercar
Wheelbase(in / mm): 110 / 2795
Engine: Honeywell LT-101
Horsepower@ % turbine speed): 650 @ 70
Torque (lb-ft @ % turbine speed): 400 @ 70
Fuel type: bio-diesel
Wheels: 20 x 10-in front_22 x 12-in rear
Tires: 255/35R20 front_305/30R22 rear
Track (in / mm): 66.9 / 1698 front_66.6 / 1692 rear
Overall length (in / mm): 184 / 4674
Overall width ( in / mm): 79.4 / 2024
Overall height (in / mm): 46.5 / 1180